Student Seminar - Evaluation criteria

Evaluation criteria for the seminar

Slides quality

5: Structure is excellent

4: Structure is good, there are minor suggestions

3: Correct global organisation, but some details lack of clarity.

2: Navigating requires some effort. Lack of structure; some parts are confusing.

1: Student does not seem to spend more than 5 mins on that

0: No slides

Clarity of the explanation/speech

5: Everything is as clear as blue sky, excellent

4: Clear overall, minor problems

3: Lack of clarity in details, but the idea explanation is understandable

2: Following requires some effort, some parts are confusing

1: Student doesn’t seem to know what they is talking about

0: Doesn’t know what to say. At all.

The paper understanding, answers to questions

5: Outstanding depth of analysis and validation process, excellent answers.

4: Very good depth in analysis, but some points remain to be investigated with more care.

3: Satisfying analysis, some potential mistakes or methodological errors in application, validation or interpretation.

2: Weaknesses in analysis, with some lack of depth.

1: Some poor understanding of the topic.

0: Total misunderstanding.